Income percentile by state
52% of households in California earn more than you
Household income at each percentile in the state, read off the Census bracket counts. The band you fall in is marked.
A household income of $95,000 in California sits in about the Bottom 48% of households in the state. The median there is $100,149 and the 90th percentile $329,110, on the 2024 American Community Survey. California ranks 6th of 51 states and DC by median income; the US median is $81,604.
- Pick the state first: each one carries its own distribution, not a shifted national curve.
- Enter gross yearly income for one earner, before tax.
- State medians differ by tens of thousands, so the same salary can be top quarter in one state and middle in the next.
Against the state and the country
The same $95,000 is the Bottom 48% in California and the Top 43% in Texas. Where you live changes the answer more than most people expect.
Every state, ranked
What the same income ranks in each, and where each state's median sits.
| State | Median | You are in | Top 10% | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| District of Columbia | $109,707 | Bottom 45% | $480,357 | |
| Massachusetts | $104,828 | Bottom 46% | $347,650 | |
| New Jersey | $104,294 | Bottom 45% | $333,442 | |
| Maryland | $102,905 | Bottom 46% | $313,746 | |
| Hawaii | $100,745 | Bottom 47% | $285,677 | |
| California | $100,149 | Bottom 48% | $329,110 | |
| New Hampshire | $99,782 | Bottom 48% | $262,339 | |
| Washington | $99,389 | Bottom 48% | $301,625 | |
| Colorado | $97,113 | Bottom 49% | $277,858 | |
| Utah | $96,658 | Bottom 49% | $238,290 | |
| Connecticut | $96,049 | Bottom 49% | $300,599 | |
| Alaska | $95,665 | Bottom 49% | $237,492 | |
| Virginia | $92,090 | Top 49% | $277,489 | |
| Delaware | $87,534 | Top 46% | $225,367 | |
| Minnesota | $87,117 | Top 47% | $235,171 | |
| New York | $85,820 | Top 46% | $284,029 | |
| Oregon | $85,220 | Top 45% | $223,220 | |
| Rhode Island | $83,504 | Top 45% | $243,715 | |
| Illinois | $83,211 | Top 45% | $239,847 | |
| Vermont | $82,730 | Top 43% | $209,820 | |
| Arizona | $81,486 | Top 43% | $220,518 | |
| Idaho | $81,166 | Top 43% | $197,269 | |
| Nevada | $81,134 | Top 43% | $213,670 | |
| Georgia | $79,991 | Top 42% | $222,191 | |
| Texas | $79,721 | Top 43% | $231,733 | |
| North Dakota | $77,871 | Top 41% | $200,881 | |
| Florida | $77,735 | Top 41% | $218,999 | |
| Pennsylvania | $77,545 | Top 41% | $218,340 | |
| Wisconsin | $77,488 | Top 41% | $196,889 | |
| South Dakota | $76,881 | Top 40% | $192,540 | |
| Maine | $76,442 | Top 40% | $203,085 | |
| Nebraska | $76,376 | Top 40% | $194,334 | |
| Wyoming | $75,532 | Top 39% | $192,225 | |
| Kansas | $75,514 | Top 39% | $199,890 | |
| Iowa | $75,501 | Top 39% | $189,900 | |
| Montana | $75,340 | Top 39% | $195,863 | |
| North Carolina | $73,958 | Top 39% | $210,816 | |
| Michigan | $72,389 | Top 38% | $196,554 | |
| South Carolina | $72,350 | Top 38% | $197,018 | |
| Ohio | $72,212 | Top 38% | $195,245 | |
| Tennessee | $71,997 | Top 38% | $197,094 | |
| Indiana | $71,959 | Top 37% | $191,058 | |
| Missouri | $71,589 | Top 37% | $194,700 | |
| New Mexico | $67,816 | Top 36% | $192,719 | |
| Alabama | $66,659 | Top 34% | $188,738 | |
| Oklahoma | $66,148 | Top 34% | $181,964 | |
| Kentucky | $64,526 | Top 33% | $182,766 | |
| Arkansas | $62,106 | Top 32% | $174,023 | |
| Louisiana | $60,986 | Top 32% | $185,701 | |
| West Virginia | $60,798 | Top 30% | $167,558 | |
| Mississippi | $59,127 | Top 30% | $168,904 |
Questions people ask
What is the median household income in California?
What income puts me in the top 10% in California?
Is this household income or personal income?
Why does the same income rank so differently by state?
How recent is this?
Method and sources
- US Census Bureau, 2024 American Community Survey 1-year estimates, tables B19013 and B19001Median household income and the sixteen-bracket household income distribution, by state
The calculation
The Census publishes how many households in each state fall into each of sixteen income brackets. A percentile is read straight off those counts and interpolated inside the one bracket your income falls in - no curve is fitted. Above $200,000 the survey stops resolving, so a Pareto tail is used, with its exponent derived from the published shares above $150,000 and above $200,000 rather than assumed. The median shown is the published figure rather than the interpolated one.
What these figures do not cover
- Household income, not personal. A two-earner household is compared with other households, not with individual salaries.
- Interpolating inside a bracket assumes incomes are spread evenly within it. Reproducing the published median this way lands within 1.8% at worst.
- Above $200,000 the answer comes from a fitted tail rather than from counts, so treat a very high percentile as approximate.
- Before tax, and not adjusted for the cost of living, which varies at least as much between states as income does.
Last updated August 2026.
Tesseract Stock Agent is a professional-grade AI research agent built to analyze stocks the way an equity desk does: deep fundamentals, real filings, evidence over noise. What the income buys matters more than where it ranks.
See Tesseract Stock Agent